Seminars of Interest at Columbia Tuesday March 21st 12:30pm to 2:00pm - Uris 326 Management Seminars - Connie Helfat (Dartmouth - Tuck) Shaping, Searching, and Endogenous Selection: The Quest for Superior Performance 2:15pm to 3:45pm - IAB 1101 Industrial Organizational & Strategy - Alex Frankel (Chicago Booth) Selecting Applicants 4:15pm to 5:45pm - IAB 1101 Money-Macro Workshop - Rasmus Lentz (University of Wisconsin - Madison) An Empirical Model of Wage Dispersion with Sorting (with Jesper Bagger) Wednesday March 22nd 2:15pm to 3:45pm - 1101 IAB International Economics Workshop - Anson Soderbery (Purdue) Title Not Available
4:10pm to 5:10pm - 614 Schermerhorn Hall Psychology Department Colloquium Series - Nate Kornell (Williams College) Title Not Available Thursday March 23rd 2:15pm to 3:45pm - Uris 140 Finance Seminar - Jean-Noel Barrot (MIT) Import Competition and Household Debt (with Erik Loualiche, Matthew Plosser and Julien Sauvagnat) 4:00pm to 5:00pm - Faculty House Language & Cognition Seminar - Lisa Sanders (University of Massachusetts) Listeners Only Hear What They Know They Don't Know
Seminars of Interest at NYU Tuesday March 21st 12:30pm to 2:00pm - Psychology Room 551 Social Psychology Brown Bags - Taly Reich (Yale) Title Not Available
2:40pm to 4:00pm - 19 W 4th Street, Room 517 Neuroeconomics Colloquium - John O'Doherty (Caltech) How goal-values are constructed in human vmPFC and OFC Thursday March 23rd 12:30pm to 1:30pm - Psychology Room 551 Cognition & Perception Colloquia - Antje Ihlefeld (NJ Institute of Technology) Title Not Available
4:30pm to 5:30pm - Psychology Room 551 Social Colloquia - Jim Coan (University of Virginia) Health, Well Being and the Social Regulation of Effort
Article of the Week Two business-school professors discovered how to make both red and blue Americans care about Trump’s drastic budget cuts Professors Eric Johnson and Elke Weber of the Center for Decision Sciences present research that shows that the way that tradeoffs between benefits and costs of budget cuts are presented can drastically impact people's opinions on public policy. More specifically, when tradeoffs are framed in terms of understandable, personal, and concrete numbers, people disagree less. |